Your Answer ▼ It is true that animals are used for various researches, such as medicines, cosmetics and other substances. It is often said that animals should not be used in testing because it is morally wrong. This essay will examine the arguments for and against animal testing.
The people who support these animal experiments say that the tests must be conducted (이런 식으로 적으면 불필요한 1인칭 사용을 줄일 수 있습니다.) we must do test before the product comes out to make sure of its safety. For instance, drug may pose significant harm to humans, so testing them on animals first gives (testing 과 호응됩니다.) researchers a good chance to determine drug safety before human trials are performed. They believe it is better to know that whether the invented drug is safe or not by testing on animals first because the human is important humans are the most important beings on the planet the most.
On the other hand, others feel that there are arguments against this. First and foremost, animal experiments are ethically wrong and would give impact a lot of distresses on animals. They believe humans should respect the lives of animals, because humans do not Human don't have the right to cause animals suffering. Second, sometimes and experiment on animals provides wrong results gives us wrong result because the human body is not exactly same as animal's body. As a consequence, they feel that animal testing is not really necessary for both of all, humans and animals. They strongly insist that all living creatures must have even rights like human being. (앞에 이미 같은 말을 했끼 때문에 굳이 반복할 필요는 없습니다.)
In conclusion, there are some convincing arguments for and against animal testings. I believe the later claim of animal experiments (여기는 어떤 의미로 적어주셨나요?). Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve human's benefits only.
----------------------------------------
영작실력이 충분하지 않아, 모범 답변을 보면서 유용한 문장과 섞어 쓰면서 충분한 시간을 가지고 작성중입니다. 감사합니다.
A: 네 joo님~천천히 큰 관점에서 접근하시고 차분하게 연습해주시면 될 것 같아요 :)
|