There are mixed opinions on the disappearance of a few languages. Some people believe that this phenomenon is a desirable outcome since communication between countries would be more effective and convenient, whereas some historical experts have insisted that the trend will bring about noticeable negative concerns. From my perspective, the maintenance ofevery language should be promoted in many ways.
First of all, a particular language spoken in a country incorporates its culture and history. That is, if the language are not used any more, its precious custom would be removed either. In fact, research conducted by some linguistics has shown that the nations that abandoned their native language and have adopted a new language spoken by leading nations are less likely to have diverse materials such as historical documents written by their initial language, which can explain a wide range of history and custom, thereby giving invaluable lessons to following generations.
On top of that, losing one’s language has a close correlation to citizens’ patriotism, which is indispensable to the development of their country. For example, Korean had been under the governing by Japan, being forced not to use Korean. Indeed, this enforcement had a substantial influence on Koreans’ patriot emotion and this in turn many Koreans had lost their identities and suffered from confusion. Given above, extinction of language could be catastrophic for citizens who had lost it.
To sum up, I strongly disagree with the view that dying out of some languages is beneficial. This is because every language is not only an asset of history and culture but also a stimulus for patriot emotion.