Your Answer ▼
The table below illustrates the data in the
survey regarding various features of a university in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, students responded positively about resources. (Overall 내용을 적는 부분이 어느정도 포괄이어야 하는 건 맞는데, 이건 너무 포괄적입니다. Range of modules offered 등에서의 예외도 있으므로 이를 반영해주세요~)
As seen from the table, nearly almost most students were satisfied with the print resources, the most accounting for 87
percent in 2000 and 88 in 2010. (2005년은 따로 언급하지 않으신 이유가 있나요?) Similarly, as technology has gradually
developed, 45 percent of the whole number of students rose up to the highest
rates with 88 percent in 2010. (여기의 경우 기술의 발전이라고만 적고 넘어가서는 안 됩니다. 숨겨진 사항, 즉 electronic resources 를 정확하게 밝혀주세요.) On the other hand, merely 35 percent of students
who liked the range of modules provided in 2000, and the figure decreased by to 27 percent in 2010,
which was the most negative result among all aspects.
In the results of teaching quality and
buildings, by and large, the figures for both were described stably over the
average (이 average 라는 단어의 쓰임이 되게 애매합니다. 그냥 딱 50%를 기준으로 삼으신 건지, 아니면 5개 항목의 평균이지 등 명확하지가 않기 때문에 다른 표현으로 바꾸는 걸 추천드려요.) throughout the decade. The former rate showed a slight fluctuation around the sixties and the latter maintained the an identical proportion with 77 percent.
In conclusion, it is proven that the
university offers more qualitative resources to students than the range of
subjects. |