▶ Your Answer :
There are various opinions on prevent
deseases in our society. Some people says governemnt should put their effort on
making healty culure among citizens which can press illness occuring factors in
their daily lifes. On the other hand, the other people insist that public
support should be focused on curing patients because they are suffering right
now, in this time. I agree with both of these opinions. However, after
comparing both views, I would like to suggest more persuasive side.
First of all, treatment approach can be
effective in case of the illness quite epidemic. In the case of SARS or MERS in
higly condensive society like today, first aid to patient is extremly
important. Beyond a moral standard that a person who is in need of care should
be cured first, a intensive approach to the people who are alread sick can
provide a security to other citizens by preventing an illness to be moved. Additionally,
we can find a brand-new remedy which can be usable in the near future while
curing a patient.
However, to prevent a illness, the best
option we can and should take is not an after service. By promoting to quality
hygiene and supply upper standard of santitation to public, we can bulid a
ground of healthy life stlye. After this hardware like approach, softwares should
followed . The government of people must encourage citizens to maintain their
health by regular exercise, cooperation to authority in realation, and be
educated about hygiene. Thrugh these multi-dimensional approach, government can
ensure best out fit which is a prevention of illness.
In conclusion, Curing a patient can be highly
effective in a selective cases. But, to achieve a prevention of deseases, a
government should invest to cultivate a healthy lifestyle among citizens that
can provide them an safe and secure society.
|