Your Answer ▼
It is undeniable that water is one of the crucial materials among them those which are made of the Earth earth. However, some Some people think that the usage of water should can be free, unlike others who argue that water is limited resource (제한된 자원인지 아닌지가 중요한 게 아니라 과연 규제를 해야하는지 그렇지 않은지가 중요해요.). In this essay, I will introduce two controversial opinions and assert my suggestion. To begin with, a lot of people could agree that using water and providing clean water can be based on human rights. Since, since people can require materials which are needed to survive in their life. On the other hand, if the government prevents citizens from using water, the a worse effect could come out. The government could discuss the equality of providing water, but this offering will provoke the gap between the poor and the rich. The wealthy people would buy the chance to that they retain water, while the poor would lose their basic right lost the basic right. In contrast, others emphasize that water is not an eternal resource anymore. To be specific, a number of people could request the environmental tax. In this way, using water can pay for money. This situation could help companies not to monopoly water. This is because Because The government’s prohibition is imposed to not only individuals imposes not only a person but also companies. Frankly speaking, it is fact that many corporates misuse the privilege that they utilize water. In addition, If if the government control water, people could respond response to the deficiency deficient of water easily. As we can see, the importance of water is explained by all of the world. some people suggest that the right using water could not be broken by the government. controversy, the others consent that water could not be unlimited material. (서론에서 한 말 다시 요약하실 필요 없고, 그냥 내 의견을 작성하고, 짧은 근거를 적은 뒤 마무리해주세요~) I believe that people should learn discipline about using water on a global scale. |