Your Answer ▼
It has been enigmatic quandary as to whether it is better to just accept a bad circumtance or to try to improve such situations like unsatisfactory job or shortage of budget. The scope and breadth of accepting what cannot be changed and learning a lesson are two paragons that reflect my point precisely. To begin with, baring (bearing 말씀하시는 건가요?) the matter that cannot be changed in the future lucidly demonstrates the issue pertaining to the theme. Some people assert taht that, if there is no way to get through, it is the best option to just accept a bad situation and not get stressed out from things that could not be changed in a while. For example, in case of lack of money financial difficulty, you can tighten your belt and buy cheap food or move to the cheaper house on a within your budget. However, it is obvious that the situation in front of you is not going to be different if further action to fix it is not executed. (결론적으로 이 문단에서 말하고자 하는 바가 무엇인지 정확히 파악하기가 어렵습니다.) On the other hand, learning a lesson from challenges indubitably epitomize my argument mentioned above. Other people believe that you can learn certain lesson from the challenge even if it fails. Furthermore, to illuminate the root cause, it should be on priority to not only try to change the circumtance but also be consistant. For instance, a world famous NBA player which who is motive of movie named the blind side Blind Side was raised in a disadvantageous household. However, he could get support fortunately and did his best in a long term then and eventually he became a milionaire with fame. (+그래서 결론이 무엇인지 예시 이후에는 마무리 문장을 덧붙여주시는 것이 좋습니다.) At first glance, it may seem like enduring the bad situation is the most reasonable action. But However, in case of unchangable problems, the way descriebed described above is the best way. Nevertheless, to make a significant change in life, it is undeniable to confront to the suffering. If it is not going well, at least, you can get a courage to face up to another challenge. |