Your Answer ▼
Undoubtedly, technology including the internet
has developed and it has changed our (1인칭은 글을 구어체로 만들기 때문에, 내 의견임을 직접적으로 드러내는 경우를 제외하면 1인칭 사용은 하지 말아주세요~) way of life significantly. Some people say
that all information can be found on internet so that the museum is no longer
needed. However, I disagree with this opinion for the following reasons. It is undeniable that the internet is
perceived as the sea of information. It has become possible to find any
information we (여기 역시 마찬가지입니다.) need by surfing the internet. It has brought about more
convenience and efficiency. For example, people can see the enormous amounts an enormous amount of
information about arts, construction, ancient treasures with detailed explanation
on the internet easily, instead of visiting a museum. In addition, the abundant
data on the internet can be available in various forms such as images, audios
or videos, and so on. Furthermore, it allows people to save the time and money it takes for visiting the real place.
Nevertheless, others claim that the museums should still be needed be existed with the purpose of the contribution to the research and the
social education. Firstly, the museums have important historical remains,
academic materials, archeological data,, (여러 개의 사항을 나열할 때에는 마지막 앞에 쉼표가 아닌 and 혹은 or 로 넣어주셔야 합니다.) works of art. Those are the priceless
and invaluable resources which have been inherited from forebears. Secondly,
museums allow people to understand the display in depth by seeing the real
materials with their own eyes and touching them with hands. To be more specific,
the sensory cognizance enables people to remember the information intelligibly.
By way of conclusion, it seems that both
methods are crucial for us (여기도 마찬가지입니다.) to collect and learn the information. However, I believe
the museums should be kept and managed continuously as above mentioned reasons.
The proper use of mixture information on the internet and in the real sources
such as museums can be beneficial for people.
|