Your Answer ▼
It is true that lots of countries will face aging population which means the large percent of elderlies. I believe that it is a detrimental change in terms of the young and country’s economic development. To begin with, (띄어쓰기와 콤마 주의해서 작성해주세요 중요합니다) the problem that younger generation would face due to increasing number ofolder population, it would be an economic burdensome for them. This is because the main income source of the older is pension paid by young people. Due to the large number of people who require economic support from the government, the amountof tax is increasing. Nevertheless, the welfare for young generation would be reduced or abolished as the majority of taxes for welfare would be allocated to the policies for elders. Therefore, the young feel burden as demanding amountof taxes while they would be neglected from the support of the government since there are a number of elders.
Similarly,aging population means that the country has less labour forces. The affluence (명사와 동사 잘 구분해주세요)of labour availability is one of the key terms in order to improve the country’seconomic level. The active circulation between producing and consuming boosts economic development while companies are no longer able to be productive without enough number of employees. For example, Japan has suffered from the lack of labourforces so that they should bring young foreign workforces from other countries to maintain proper function of companies. Likewise, higher proportion of elderlies would harm the country’s economic growth.
To conclude,the level of tax paid by young people is rising to support growing number of elderlies, thus it causes an economic difficulty to the young. Also, the country becomes vulnerable to suffer from economic depression due to the lack of labour availability. Therefore, I argue that higher proportion of the elder is a negative change of the country. |