The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children, rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People usually have divided views on governments money. Some people think that the government should spend money on professional sports and art performance for the public. However, I agree with the idea that governments money should be spent on schools for children to take part in art and sports classes for two main reasons.
To begin with, learning art and sport affects children positively. However, some children do not have opportunities to learn those subjects because they do not have enough money to learn in private institutes. When the government supports schools financially, children can grab chance to learn sports and art for free. According to a recent survey, children who attended sports classes are less likely to be obesity, and also the children knows how to deal with their stress through drawing and painting. For this reason, the government should spend money on school for children.
In addition, when the government encourages children to attend sports and art in schools by giving subsidies, children can embrace opportunities to discover unknown talents. Most children learn only academic subjects such as science and math in school, so children do not know about their talents. From my experience, i did not know about my art ability before, but after i started to learn art in school, i found my talent. It helped me to choose my future major and job. For this reason, the government should support children financially to take part in art and sports classes.
In conclusion, the government provides schools with subsidies to encourage children in order to take part in art and sports classes because the classes have positive effects on children.