▶ Your Answer :
Traditionally, the arduous works has been exclusive property
of male. As time goes on, however, a number of women tend to join actively some
strenuous jobs such as servicewoman and police officer. There was a division of
opinions between those who agree and disagree, I think female also ought to
participate in national defense and public order.
It is obvious true
that the considerable differences are existed genetically between masculine and
feminine. As the combination of hormone and heredity, women are generally
weaker, having low physical abilities and the huge risk of injury since their
muscles are not developed enough to do some excessive things. Henceforth, some
people argue that female are not suitable for tough tasks which need high manual
labor.
By and large, masculine have more opportunities of participation in related to social and
community services than feminine. Yet, from 20th century, societies have been
placed a much value on the human right of women. They perceived that they could
overcome their handicaps through work out and exercise which help to improve
their physical and mental capabilities. For instance, a few years ago, in South
Korea, a woman was appointed primally as the chief of the National Police
Agency. It presented female also could fulfill their aim with being free from
restraint.
To sum up, the both views in terms of feminine's join on
defense of cities and countries have each ideas. I believe even if there are
some adversity, they can surmount fully through their exertion. Thus, we need
to encourage the spread of chances which female can take proportions in social
and national security.
|