Your Answer ▼
It is undeniable that water is one of the crucial materials among them which are made of the earth. However, some people think that the usage of water can be free, unlike others who argue that water is limited resource. In this essay, I will introduce two controversial opinions and assert my suggestion. To begin with, a lot of people could agree that using water and providing clean water can be based on human rights. Since people can require materials which are needed to survive in their life. On the other hand, if the government prevents using water, the worse effect could come out. The government could discuss the equality of providing water, but this offering will provoke the gap between the poor and the rich. The wealthy people would buy the chance that they retain water, while the poor lost the basic right. In contrast, others emphasize that water is not an eternal resource anymore. To be specific, a number of people could request the environmental tax. In this way, using water can pay for money. This situation could help companies not to monopoly water. Because The government’s prohibition imposes not only a person but also companies. Frankly speaking, it is fact that many corporate misuse the privilege that they utilize water. In addition, If the government control water, people could response to the deficient of water easily. As we can see, the importance of water is explained by all of the world. some people suggest that the right using water could not be broken by the government. controversy, the others consent that water could not be unlimited material. I believe that people should learn discipline about using water on a global scale. |