Your Answer ▼ Some people think that augment in the number of sports facilities will improve maintaining people's health. On the other hand, there are other people who contend a counterargument that other solutions are necessary rather than increasing number of places for sports. People who opine for the increase in the number of sports centers strongly believe that it will induce people to work out more. In fact, if there are only a few sports facilities in vicinity of people's accommodations, they would not think exercise is worth much time taking. However it will certainly encourage People people to work out if the exercise facilities are near by their houses. For example, I was not interested in exercise few years ago. However, I determined to start it when I realized a new fitness club is under construction ('공사가 다 완료되었을 때' 라고 적는 게 적절하지 않을까요?) in a the place that takes me to go only takes (이렇게 바꾸면 굳이 me 같은 구어체의 표현을 사용하지 않아도 됩니다.) 5 minutes from my house. As for those who think increasing sports infrastructures is not as effective as other ways, they claim that the different manner such as adjusting cost of sugary food is the best solution. One of the main factor of deterioration of health is partaking bad (heesoo님 정도의 영작 실력이면, 충분히 이보다 더 나은 단어를 찾으실 수 있을 겁니다.) foods like candy, cracker and fast food. However, foods that undermine health are easy to purchase due to their low cost. Preventing people from eating inordinate amount of sugar by increasing the price of bad food will improve the public's heath. All in all, I think both of two different both contentions are good ways of improving people's health. I certainly think that more facilities would help people to work out in more convenient and accessible way. Also, I agree with the claim that other measurement like increasing the increase cost of sugary food will be another effective inducement.
|