Your Answer ▼ There is debate about
the usefulness of old buildings because some people say that it is not
necessary to preserve them considering the importance of land, while others
believe that old buildings should be preserved due to historical importance. Although out-of-dated
buildings would be unnecessary thing in our cities, I believe that preserving
them is indispensable part because they are our important cultural heritage.
On the one hand, some people say that preserving the
old building is not essential thing considering fact that land is limited in
our cities. Today, as population in cities are growing more and more, the
available space of cities which can accomodate the growing people is
downsizing. This means that we need more space to have apartments for people to
live in. Also, we need to build schools for purporse of increasing demand in
education, hospitals for the better treatment, and theaters and stadiums for
the leisure life of citizens. However, the old buildings in our cities might
restrict to build this useful buildings. Therefore, the argument that
preserving the old building is not essential thing would be justified.
Neverthelss, I support the idea that preserving the
historical building is highly important because people can learn history and
culture of their nation through them. Without these buildings, there woud be not
opportunity to learn and experience about the history,culture and lives of
ancient period. For example, the Kyoungbok palace, which is located in the
heart of Seoul, the capital in Korea, occupies considerable area of the city.
However, people in Seoul can learn the history of Chosun dynasty, which is the
ancient period of Korea, as well as the architecture style of that period from
this building. Also, they can experience how people in Chosun dynasty lived.
This shows that the old buildings are enormously helpful in terms of history
education.
In conclusion, while out-of-date buildings are
regarded unnecessary thing by some people, I still believe that they are an essential part of our cities because of the importance of history education.
이러한 both view 문제 형태에서 평소에 궁금한 내용이 있습니다. 이 답안처럼 제가 동의하지 않는 의견을 첫번째 body에, 제가 지지하는 의견을 두번째 body 에 넣고, 결론에서 다시한번 정리하는 식으로 마무리했는데요, 이렇게 해도 크게 문제가 없을지? 아니면 제 포지션을 좀 더 명확히 해주는 것이 좋을 까요? (예를 들어 제가 동의하지 않는 의견을 반박하거나, 지지하는 의견이 동의하지 않는 의견보다 더 낫다는 식으로..) |