It is true that, in modern society, wide animals
lost their habitats by developing human civilization. It is argue whether
keeping wide life just drains resources or not. I strongly, however, disagree
with this statement. I would recommend that it is necessary to protect wild
animals, because there are some benefits which are economical and academic
aspect.
The first reason is that we can earn financial
value with living wild animals. For example, people can build National Park to
make money as well as create jobs. Nowadays, many people want to go to wild
life sanctuaries as tour packages to relieve their stress. In addition, natural
resources occasionally are made by some species of them. The excretion of
Albatross which is a kind of bird changes the phosphate rock as time passed. It
is used as main material of chemical fertilizer which means they provide human
race with valuable resources.
Secondly, they can help learn academic studies.
According to BBC(2015), scientists can expect the future of the mankind through
changing the past of wild life animals and we can analysis how to handle the
crisis of the earth. Furthermore, most zoologists hope to keep them to research
their natural character. It is very difficult if they become extinct, because
it is hard to check their habit without observation in direct. For instance,
most theories are inference about the dinosaurs.
In conclusion, nowadays, many people do not want to
protect wild animals, because we have to waste a lot of natural resources. I
believe, however, that wild life give us many benefits about financial and
scientific value. |