Your Answer ▼
It is a common belief that human labor can would (can 과 would 는 전혀 다르고, 논제에 따르면 후자를 다뤄주셔야 합니다.) be mostly replaced by artificial intelligence in the near future. However,
there is a more persuasive argument that artificial intelligence is not able to
invade human’s own sphere.
On the one hand, artificial intelligence is
regarded as an alternative tool for processing tasks due to its high speed and
efficient work performance. In effect, a machine is not exhausted, non-time
wasting, and a non-faulty device itself. Therefore, it can generate maximum amount
of products within a short time. Take the example of a recent auto industry. Most
of its production lines from small part manufacturing to overall assembly
process have been are replaced by machines because this process is required to maximize
productivity and machine is optimal system for that.
Nevertheless, it is evident that there are
still exist lot of fields and subjects which cannot be alternated by artificial
intelligence. Not all part of human’s life can be illustrated with accurate calculations
or mechanical activities. A machine is a machine and it doesn’t (줄임말 사용을 지양해주세요!) have a mind,
emotion and humanistic sprit. In other words, There there are some things something that only
human beings can do. Art can be a good example for that. It is an activity to
express our emotion, imagination, beauty which shows unlimited universe and
diversity, not requiring only one answer that might easily derived from the artificial
intelligence. In short, as artificial intelligence technology develops, human’s
role will be more emphasized in every sector.
To sum up, while it is apparent that a
machine has taken a considerable part of our works, (이건 쓸 필요 없고, 내 의견만 작성하면 되니까, 이를 대신해서 바로 뒤의 주장에 대한 짧은 근거를 넣어주세요.) it is undeniable that a
human’s intrinsic role is still pervasive in all part of our life and it will
never be replaced by anything in the world.
|