▶ Your Answer :
With the advent of television,
watching a performance on TV became pretty common and not only
people’s lives got much comfortable but also people can save time
and money with it. I strongly disagree with the view that attending a
live performance is better than watching it on TV.
To begin with, people who watch a
performance by TV can relax in the comfort of home. To be specific,
those people can sit back and relax not only with anything they want
to eat, but also with family or friends who they want to enjoy the
performance together. From my personal experience, there was a World
Ballet Contest every year and my whole family used to watch it at my
home with food and drinks galore. Frankly, there was no strict dress
code and no uncomfortable seats. People become true audience to
concentrate on a performance when they are in the environment with
calm and comfort.
In addition, saving time and money
would be an effective outcome as well. Without a doubt, audience from
their house do not have to pay for the ticket and they can also save
their time because there will not be any killing of time in dealing
with traffic. According to the survey conducted by American Superior
Art Foundation, the quality of satisfaction rate in viewing a
performance in person was substantially higher than people who
watched in the concert hall. The foundation pointed out that the main
reason of the result in survey was the advantage of saving time and
money.
In conclusion, I do strongly believe
that watching a performance in private by TV is more effective
because audience can not only save their precious time and money, but
also they can watch in comfort environment.
|