▶ Your Answer :
Some people argue that sports pros are dealt with receiving extremely high salary on their performance. Others, however, refute this opinion that they deserve earning a great deal amount of income in terms of their contribution to their sports area. I am going to discuss both opinions with my personal aspects.
To begin with, extraordinary income of sports professionals could be considered as quite biased treatment. Some professionals condemn that the salary of sports star is remarkably higher than the others of any specialized area and they are sometimes stunned by news informing the income of sportsmen. I think >> In my opinion, 으로 작성해주시는게 좋습니다 this is because many sports unions or organizations normally cover up normally how much cost did they pay for purchasing assess and allot the cost of each pro player when they offer a transfer to take the players part in their team. Therefore, it can be seen that this kind of process is not so transparent.
However, I am convinced that the sports players must earn high salary as they would have been >> would have pp의 형태는 우선 ~ 했었어야 했는데 정도의 뜻이 있습니다 그리고 또한 수동형으로 말이 되지 않습니다 dedicate 자체가 헌신하다라는 뜻이기 때문입니다 dedicated for many years to get make >> get 동사는 피해주세요 the best score result or achievement in their own area. For example, one of the famous athletes in my country began to engage in football >> 한 단어입니다 since he was nine years old and . 깁니다 끊어주세요. He, firstly, achieved his targeting goal to with get a scoring in an international match when his age he was 24 years old. Therefore, in many occasions, it is clear that many athletes are forced to sacrifice their whole youth period in order to succeed in their area.
In conclusion, I consider that the salary was given to sports professionals should be highly allotted because the amount the financial reward is not so expensive when their contributions to teams' feat are taken into consideration as a whole great outcome. However, to what extent, I agree with that the criteria of assessing their salary should be revealed fairly and clearly to the public for general understanding.
전반적으로 글 구성이 좋았습니다
하지만 결론에선 서론에서 쓴 내용을 페러프레이즈 해서 쓰는 것이 훨씬 깔끔하고 좋습니다
결국 본론도 서론에서부터 확장된 글이기에 서론을 페러프레이즈 해주는 것이 간단하고 좋습니다
Task Achievement - 7 Coherence and Cohesion - 7 Lexical Resource - 6 Grammatical Range and Accuracy - 6
6.5 예상합니다 |