In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words.
It has been observed the appearance of developed railway line by a new technic. Some people argue that numerous countries have to fund in constructing train lines whereas other people think that enhancing extant public transport is rather than it. Both views will be discussed but I believe the former view is more persuasive.
On the one hand, there are some people who say the latter view that governments should focus existing railway. This is mainly because, increasing number of people opt public transport to commute or travel due to the inexpensive fare or faster. In this circumstance, if other transportation will be formed, it drives some confusion. To be more specific, to be replaced or formulated high-tech metro requires adequate session not only take build it but also need to be adjusted new system and added place. In this process, there generates a few gaps between previous railway and planned one such as subways’ work schedules, the time required, location and fare.
On the other hand, there has an advantageous implication to citizens and locals. First and foremost, new under way systems, connect between two cities, allow citizens to better quality of life. If the railway will be constructed, individuals able to travel other regions faster so that they can enjoy other facilities which are not in their city. Through it, two cities would become the role of complementary economically.
In conclusion, although the development of new railway system generate some confusions on the schedule of train work, location and so on, there are no doubt the convenience and benefit financially.
총 글자수:262자
총 소요시간:40분