▶ Your Answer : There has been a long dispute on the ehtics of medical and biological experiment on living creature. Generally, the aim of those experiments was will be to confirm the safety of specific products,>> 콤마 빼주세요 such as new medicine or medical devices, if they>>?? animal subjects are applied biologically to human. In many countries, the government agencies like , such as FDA in the USA, are responsible for the safety of medicine and food, require the companies, which plan to sell a new product, to submit the result of experiments on living creature.>> ?? 수식에 수식은 원어민도 이해하지 못하게 만듭니다
However, the opponents of those experiments criticize them as for the reason of unethical and cruel things. They insist that it is the violation of the right of animals, which means that every living creature has the divine right to live and die with dignity, and, therefore, . Besides, sacrificing those animals for the interest of human is an unforgivable behavior and should be banned. In addition, due to the biological difference between human and other species, the result of experiments on animals would fail to guarantee the safety of human beings >> 서론에서 이미 인간에게 적용이 되는 가정 하에 실험이 진행된다고 명시했는데 말에 오류가 있습니다. The development of genetics demonstrated that the genome of human is absolutely different from that of other species.
However, >> 문단의 첫 시작을 쓰는 단어는 무수히 많은데 본론1과 같은 것을 쓰셨네요 the proponents of those experiment animal experiments support them on the basis of inevitability. According to them, there are no other alternatives to the experiment on living creatures as the animals are the most identical creature to human on earth. Even though it seems to be cruel, there is no basic difference between the behavior of eating meat and experiment on animals.
In my opinion, the experiments on living creature seems to be the most effective tool to prove the safety on human considering the level of modern science and technology. However, considering the ethics of life ethics, more carefully devised experiment is necessary. For example, decreasing the pain of animals or clean the environment for them would be regarded as possible means to promote the ethics of animal life.
글을 다 읽고 든 생각은 그래서 주장이 뭐지? 입니다
테스크는 What do you think? 입니다
어떻게 생각하냐는 말인데 장단점을 모두 언급할 필요도 없습니다
결국은 한다는 말인데 본론에선 안 좋은 점들을 많이 썼죠
한 주제를 정해서 써주시길 바랍니다 본론 1에 현재 본론2에 쓴 것을 쓰고
본론2에 결론에 쓴 내용들을 본인 생각으로 넣고
결론에 서론에 쓴 메인 센텐스를 페러프레이즈 해서 마무리해주세요
living creature도 너무 많습니다
Task Achievement - 5 Coherence and Cohesion - 6 Lexical Resource - 6 Grammatical Range and Accuracy - 6
6.0 예상합니다 |