Your Answer ▼
These days, there are many museums that charge for admission, while but others are free of charge. It is undeniable that charging people for admission to museums has disadvantages. Although charging fees (지금 벌써 네 번이나 쓰였고, 앞으로도 쓰이고 있기 때문에 글의 되게 단조로워지고 있습니다. 대체를 꼭 해주셔야 해요.) to museums has shortcomings, the merits on charging for admission far outweigh the drawbacks.
Admittedly, it it true that there are some disadvantages on charging people for some money to museums. It is generally considered that museum has some characteristics as public materials, and so some people believe that museums do not have to charge for admission fees. To be specific, if If some museums receive admission, people would not want to make a visit (이렇게 수정하면 museum 이 반복되는 것을 피할 수 있습니다.) woud not go to the museum. Therefore, the rates of visiting museum might decrease. In fact, some cities charged for admission for people and so museum changed admission policy to free of charge. (앞에서 했던 말을 표현만 바꿔서 그대로 반복하지 않도록 주의해주셔야 합니다.)
In spite of shortcomings in policy on charging for admission to museums, imposing (이런 시도를 더 많이 해주시면 됩니다.) admission about visiting museums can not be ignored. Nowadays, many municipal governments have difficulties on economic status. In addition, local cities want to gather more money to meet citizen's various needs, but there are some limits to fund due to the low economic environments. Therefore, it is necessary that museums have to impose admission to the public. In some local governments, money that is accumulated by admission to museum is used well to improve the museum facility and enhance citizens' needs.
In conclusion, although charging people for admission to museums is disadvantageous disadvantages, the merits on imposing admission its merits far outweigh the shortcomings. Charging people for admisson (철자 오류가 나지 않도록 주의해주세요.) to museums is more good to services for the public. |