Your Answer ▼ It is a common belief that deciding to remain childless negatively affects society as a whole. However, there is a persuasive argument thath choosing to not getting child can be a positive desicion. In fact, with fewer children, society can provide better education and childcare options.
On the one hand, the number of children in one society decreasing will cause labor of shortage, finally. We need young people to continually join the workforce to foster economic growth. However, with more couples deciding against having children, the number of available workers will eventually decrease. In fact, recent research has shown that we are headed towards what is known as a 'demographic cliff', a rapid reduction of the working age population. This means that there will be fewer people of working age who can support both their children and the increasing amount of elderly retirees.
Nevertheless, the society with lower birth-rate can provide better life to children,who are living in there. Since the funds available to a society are limited, providing sufficient childcare and education becomes difficult when there are more children. However,with fewer children, societies can offer better services with the same amount of resources. To illustrate, a school with 100 students may have a budget that only allows for basic educational needs. Yet if the number of students was halved, the extra money may permit the school to provide a better quality of education using state-of-the art tools. It would produce well-educated students who are prepared to business and would increase an efficency of school.
To sum up, while there are some disadvantages to an increase in childless couples, it is evident that there are much more advantages of birth-rate reduction in one country. |