Your Answer ▼ (284words)
Despite the improvement of technology in
agriculture and its results in higher outcomes, some people still suffer from
the hunger. There are several reasons for this and solutions to tackle the
problem, which will be discussed in this essay.
There are some reasons to explain the issue
regarding the famine in certain areas, despite the fact that the while the outcome from agriculture
has improved a lot in the past years. First of all, local politics and its
unfair societal structure is one of the reasons. In other words, the dictatorship
or unbalanced power to distribute (여기를 통해 의도하신 문맥이 몇 개 있어서 정확히 뭘로 수정해드려야 할지는 모르겠지만, to 보다는 더 나은 표현이 있지 않을까 싶네요.) the resources within one country can make people
suffer from the starvation even they produce more agricultural products. On top
of that, from an international relations perspective, unfair trade terms
between countries is another reason to explain the famine in a developed
agricultural environment. Although the total outcome from agriculture
improves, trades are still required. However, international trade terms often
reflect the benefits of more powerful countries’ benefits, which leads to an imbalance in the distribution
of the products.
Some solutions can be taken to tackle this
issue. Firstly, local politics should be improved in order to allocate the
product fairly as well as to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
Since the allocation matters than the increase of total pie, the starvation can
be reduced if the local political system functions fairly (그래서 어떻게 improved 할 건지, 혹은 어떻게 fairly function 할 건지를 적어주셔야 합니다. 그렇지 않고는 그저 '아 일단 나아져야 하는데, 나아져야 하지만 나는 어떻게 나아져야 할지는 모르겠고, 여하튼 나아져야 해~' 에 지나지 않습니다.). Furthermore, trade terms
for poorer countries should be protected. As trade terms often impact on the imported
goods’ prices, protection for poorer countries can make agricultural products
more affordable.
To conclude, it seems to me that local and
international politics are key to solve the famine in modern society, since the distribution of resources is more important than the increase in agricultural products. ('원인' 도 조금 더 직접적으로 드러나도록 수정해보세요!)
|