Your Answer ▼
Some people claim that there will be a decline in travelling by air in the coming years. From my perspective, this phenomenon could be seen as a negative advancement since it would deteriorate the exchange in the global society as well as hinder people's desire to explore a new world.
To begin with, if air travel is reduced, the international trade industry would severely be (be severely 도 가능합니다.) hit by this trend. As a majority of cargos and people travel by air these days, the contraction in air travel will induce price inflation. This will subsequently freeze the relevant industry and impede the economic growth of the global society as a whole in the long run. In particular, businessmen would be irritated by less schedule of air travel if there is an urgent meeting held in another country. The same situation applies to the movement of cargo; the increasing number of business people would find it inconvenient to export or import goods from other countries.
Besides, people who frequently travel to other countries to explore and learn new cultures to broaden their knowledge will be discouraged by the decrease in air travel. The exchange of culture not only excites and refreshes some people from time to time but also enlarges their perspective that they can push the improvement of society. In addition to this, when people are prevented from travelling abroad, they tend to become more rigid and stubborn in outlook so there is a higher possibility that they will become a closed-minded person who cannot bear diversity in society.
To recapitulate, there are several negative consequences the decrease in air travel might cause in society: (콜론은 가능하면 안 쓰는 게 낫습니다.) in the long run, society would be affected adversely because of the hampered international trades and businesses along with the rigidness of people caused by the hindrance of travelling abroad. |