Your Answer ▼ In recent years, the number of languages has gradually decreased in the world. Some people insist that it is crucial for people to keep their own languages. However, I agree that dying out some languages dying out is not important.(문제의 statement와 정확하게 호흡을 하고 있다는 느낌을 주기 위해선, 서술의 방식을 반대로 써주시는 것이 좋습니다. 즉, 어떤 사람들은 몇 언어가 사라지는 것이 좋을 거라 생각한다. However, I disagree with this opinion. 이런 식으로 문제에 나온 statement 자체를 그대로 보여주시는 것이죠!) This essay will discuss some of the reasons for my claim.
The first reason is to do with communication. To put it another way, by using fewer languages, people can communicate with foreigners easier. For example(여기서의 예시는 앞 문장을 부연설명해서 보여주는 예시가 되어야 합니다. 즉, "외국인과 대화를 하면 더 스무스한 관계를 형성할 수 있다"라는 예시가 아닌, "언어의 개수가 줄어들어 언어의 장벽이 완화된다면 사람들이 국경에 상관없이 대화를 하는 것이 더 수월해질 것"을 보여주는 예시가 나와야 한다는 것입니다.), when one has a conversation with a foreigner, he or she can build a relationship more smoothly. I once read about the results of a survey conducted on by English(어떤 의미로 써주신 걸까요?), and over 76% of them responded that the more we use fewer languages, the more our communication will become easy.
Second, using just fewer languages reduces the amount of learning from for children. In other words, when there are fewer languages in the world, it makes children stressed less get less stress. For my experience, when I was a middle school student, I was under the pressure to study various languages in various subjects such as French, Chinese, and Vietnamese. If I learned only one or two languages, I could have focused even more andcould have done well. Nowadays, as the number of languages that children need to study increases, they are under the stress. Therefore, the extinction of some languages is important in terms of the learning of children.
To sum up, I firmly support the idea that dying out the disappearance of some languages is important. The main reasons for my claim are easier global communication and the less amount of children's learning. |