Your Answer ▼ The countries are not able to afford funds by themselves needs some help from all over the world. It can be many ways, but some people say that financial help should be a priority or there is a group that insist more practical aid such as new technologies, infra system is more crucial. In this essay, I'll look both sides and conclude which one is more reasonable. One of the reasons why some think that financial help is more valuable is the economic aid is related to people's survive more than anything. Due to the aid they can afford drinkable clean water, foods on a regular basis. Without those, they can not even survive long. More than that, to accept the practical aid rather than another, they have so many people that are desperate for the aid. If the country can not take all expenses for supporting them, the aim that other countries expect will not be satisfied. On the other hand, others claim that just giving money aid can not be a solution in a long term. It should go for making new infra system, such as building schools, hospitals, transportations. Because they have been helping the countries financially so long, but it does not seem to happen by the looks of it. Secondly, most of developing countries have a lot of resources on and under the ground which means that they can use it to trade and get a lot of money. It is a well-known fact that they have a lot of resources can be used in a lot of countries in Africa. In conclusion, I believe that more technical aid with great advices is more beneficial for them in the long term if it is with some financial aid. The developing countries are able to find great solutions in other type of ways of help more than just funds all over the world, and it can make remarkable effects for them eventually. |