Your Answer ▼Some people believe that the government should allocate financial resources to creative artists while others insist that they should look for different ways of receiving funds, rather than not from the government. I personally believe that people who perform the arts should be supported by the government.
On top of that, some extent insist that artists are a national treasure as they happen to help counties preserve and promote local culture. Also, it is certainly difficult for artists to create outstanding artworks without funds since it would take long time to complete their hard work. They need time and money to develop their creations and skills. In the long term, their artworks will be able to take a great role of promoting their countries and cultures. There are many examples of famous artists who were supported by the government like musicians and writers. (아쉽지만 근거로써 정말 아무런 의미를 갖지 못합니다. 이 문단의 역할은, '왜' 정부가 예술가들에 대한 투자를 하는지 밝혀야 하는 것인데, 그냥 '많은 유명 예술가들이 정부의 지원을 받았다.' 라고 적는 것으로는 저 '왜' 를 전혀 해결할 수 없어요.)
On the other hand, inevitably other people feel that it’s unfair because it cannot fulfil other ordinary people’s basic needs due to lack of budget. Government have a responsibility to able to provide basic necessities of life to everyone not only artists. In many other countries, lacking of housing and food are still serious problems and it is primary objectives of the governments. Moreover, it is difficult to figure out that who is eligible for and talented enough to receive government funding. If the artists fail to finish their artwork, the government might seek to deflect criticism from public by blaming them. (이 문단의 경우도 다시 작성해주셔야 하는데, 여기는 총평에서 말씀드리겠습니다.)
To sum up, there are different opinions on whether the government should assist the artists or not (파란색까지 묶어서 말씀드릴게요.), however, I feel that creating artworks such as music, literature and paints are possible national heritage. Therefore, assisting artists is paramount in the modern society.
|