Your Answer ▼
The two graphs illustrate the rate of films screened in the UK and Australia in 2001, which were categorized into Us Films, UK Films, Australian
Films and Others in the UK and Australia, 2001 and cinema admission in those
countries 1976 to 2006. Units of two charts were measured in percentage and
million.
Overall, in
chart A, the ratio of Us Films screened was higher than that of Australia
except a portion. (여기는 어떤 의미로 적어주셨나요? 댓글 주시면 확인하고 수정해드리겠습니다.) Both nations had imported
the most US Films the most while the lowest part was Australian films in Australia compared
to UK that the least point was others movies. (이러한 경우에는 기타를 제외하고 따져주시면 됩니다. 그리고 작성할 때 '기타를 제외하고 가장 낮은 것은~~' 으로 전제를 깔아주시면 되고요.) In terms of graph B, in the same
way, it more clearly shows that the movie screened in UK was higher than
Australia. (관객 관련 내용임을 명시해주세요. 이게 표 B의 핵심입니다.) Moreover, it is clear that the highest point of two countries were in about 2002-2003, on the other hand, the lowest points of two were a little
different at 1984 in UK and 1976 in Australia.
The rate of US Films
screened in Australia in 2001 hit highest point (76%) (highest point 는 시간의 흐름에 따라 이루어진 표 B 에서나 쓸 수 있고, 여기에서는 그냥 그 수치가 가장 높았다 정도로만 적어주시면 돼요.) in two countries while
Australian Films played in Australia was lowest point (마찬가지입니다.) at about 1.7%. In the same way, the share of UK films in the UK were 21% in
2001 and it was more than tripled compared to Australia at about 8%. Finally, others were only 4% in UK, however,
that in Australia more than four-folded at roughly 17%.
In case of the
chart B, the highest points of UK and Australian cinema admission were about
170 millions in 2002 and roughly 95 millions in 2001 respectively whilst the
lowest point of UK and Australian were each (여기에도 '대략의' 라는 의미를 담아주세요.) 57 millions in 1983 and
approximately 22 millions in 1976. Those are indicating that cinema admission
of two countries hit the highest point in same period, on the other hand that of
two nations reached the lowest points in other years. |