Your Answer ▼
For past generations, it has been an
enigmatic quandary as to whether punishment is necessary to help children learn
difference between right and wrong. However, it is evident that punishment is
required to children to be good adults to some extent. Although history and
literature are replete with countless examples, the scope and breadth of immature
knowledge and slight regulation are two paragons that reverberate such a view.
To begin with, immature knowledge obviously
explains the matter pertaining to this theme. Children are young in their body
and think, so they need educations from adults who know better than them. To be
specific, they’re knowledge are not enough to grown to decide what things they should
follow. Therefore, adults may teach them to learn what is right and wrong for
them to be a better person, with a slight punishment if required. Consequently,
punishment to children is necessary in order them to be more morally in future.
Furthermore, slight regulation clearly
exemplifies the issue at hand. Parents and teachers can punish children with
various ways depend on situations. For instance, in their home, parents can
give some penalties to their children such as no eating sweets, no watching TV if
children didn’t follow house rules. In school, teachers also able to let
children to do writing letters, raising their hand, cleaning classroom as a penalty.
Thus, as shown in the case of give slight penalties, one can explicitly see why
I prefer that some kinds of punishment are required to children to some extent.
At first glance, it may seem like adults
can never punish children to teach them, but the examples of immature knowledge
and slight regulation lucidly prove that parents and teachers teach children about
what is right and wrong, with a punishment. |