Your Answer ▼
It is a common belief that the idea of intruding people’s liberties is bad. These days, many people who are living in the capitalism society say that restricting freedom of human being because of the security of society is not right in modern times. If someone who lives in a country which curbs freedom due to the security posts stories about the government in a bad way, the government could stop him (임의로 특정 성별에 대해서만 적지 않도록 주의해주세요~) from writing those stories down and keep society from developing toward better ways. They think it can be detrimental to the improvement of the country and it might stop people from making a revolution.
However, I firmly believe that one’s freedom can be violated by the government depending on the purpose of the infringement/action ('행위' 와 관련된 단어로 넣어주세요!) person. First of all, Many many people have their own mindset, therefore there are lots of conflicts about something religious, regional, sexual and political. For example, when someone looks up how to make a terror because her or his thoughts are thinking is different from a common belief, the government can violate him or her (앞의 her or his 와 통일이 되어야 합니다.). By violating selective freedom, we could decrease the possibility of terror and terminate the terrorism could be decreased or even eliminated.
Second of all, the government could keep the order of society in a peace. They stop the conflicts happening in case, so people could keep their life peacefully without any wars. Moreover, they don’t would not (참고로, 줄임말 사용은 지양해주세요!) have to be worried about happening any conflicts so the society will be better in many ways.
The point is that how the government do restrict freedom selectively and fairly. They should not limit liberty of people who are not thinking about the problems that might cause a serious issue selfishly. |