Your Answer ▼
Parents are faced
with the challenge of giving their children to lead satisfying
lives. Some people think that parents’
intervention in children's lifestyle is
necessary, but I would argue the opinion that parents should allow
children to be more free to manage their
own chores.
There is an
opinion that children should abide by their parent's principles at home or anywhere. This is because a child they were was born from their parents and they
are responsible for them. Therefore, these youngsters should not be surprised
or looked displeased when their parents make rules that have an effect
on their lifestyles. For example, by forcing a child to spend more time on
study, parents are more likely to focus on their
duties for work and home rather than being wary of the child. Parents may also
restrict or regulate certain products because it is they are considered unhealthy for their
youngsters. This is a controversial issue, but many parents do support
laws that curb the
used of certain drugs.
However, a line
needs to be drawn somewhere, as the
increasing number of children are growing restless over the thought of
parents’ control in their lives. Widely spread
technologies involving the surveillance camera
have fuelled the idea that we need to carefully think about the parents' role.
Those children who are being observed their parents out
of camera could lose the sense of basic freedom if legal habits like
internet surfing come under parents control. Although parents deciding what
to do, when and where everything may lead to the overall
the improvement of children’s academic learning skill, they might complain that they
cannot feel free when they are prevented from outdoor activities even in some
outdoor areas with their peer group.
In conclusion,
there are arguments both for and against intervention
by parents in children’s lives, but I am
convinced that children should be able to make their own choices about how
they spend time as long as their school classes are
not affected.
|