Your Answer ▼
It is a common belief that personal
data of brutal offenders protect. However, there is a more persuasive argument
that every data of culprits is supposed to be open to the public.
On other hands, a lot of countries forbid from opening the personal materials of culprits to the public because some people believe that privacy
is should be a priority after criminals are released
from jail. If their personal information is shown to the public, they would not be able to have a normal life even if they were reformed. In fact, most of
the criminals who have already
been released are getting
suffer from the criminal sensor, which called electronic anklet. Moreover, it would be quite difficult to get a new job especially at the company
and public institution. In Korea, for instance, businesses never hire criminals for enterprising image
management in addition, offenders are never able to be a public servant by law.
Nevertheless, it is more important to prevent crime by showing the personal detail of intense criminals
to the official. As a matter of fact, there are so many second crimes. Those
who are released from prison are potential
criminals. According to news, a person who has been
committed crime before are more likely to significantly crime again. The
proportion of crime by second
offenders is much higher than
that made by the first offender. Furthermore, the victims have to suffer from aftereffect even criminals have already gone
to jail because they would eventually be released from prison if they are not under
sentence of life imprisonment.
To sum up, while it is apparent that
criminals should be protected to the public, it is undeniable that prevent the
second crime and victim's problem always should be a top priority. |