Your Answer ▼
It is a common belief that the personal
data of brutal offenders should be protected. However, there is a more persuasive argument
that every data of culprits is supposed to should be open to the public.
On other hands the one hand, a lot of countries forbid from opening the personal materials of culprits to the public because some people believe that privacy
is should be a priority after criminals are released
from jail. If their personal information is shown to the public, they would not be able to have a normal life even if they were reformed. In fact, most of
the criminals who have already
been released are getting
suffering from the criminal sensor, which is called the electronic anklet (제가 법에 관해서 잘은 모르지만 전자발찌는 성폭행범 한정으로만 부여되지 않나요?). Moreover, it would be quite difficult to get a new job especially at the company companies and public institutions. In Korea, for instance, businesses never hire criminals because if they do so, it would have a serious impact on their image. for enterprising image
management in In addition, offenders are never able to be a public servant by law. (범죄자도 아예 공무원이 되지 못하는 건 아닙니다. 형을 받고 일정 기간이 지났으면 결격사유가 되지 않아요.)
Nevertheless, it is more important to prevent crime by showing the personal detail of intense criminals
to the official. As a matter of fact, there are so many second crimes. Those
who are released from prison are potential
criminals. According to news, a person who has been
committed crime before are more likely to significantly crime do so again. The
proportion of crime by second
offenders is much higher than
that made by the first offender. Furthermore, the victims have to suffer from aftereffect even if criminals have already gone
to jail because they would eventually be released from prison if they are not under a sentence of life imprisonment.
To sum up, while it is apparent that
criminals should be protected to the public, it is undeniable that preventing the
second crime and victim's problems always should be a top priority. |