Some people believe that unpaid community service
should be a compulsory part of high school programmes(for example working for
a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger
children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? |
It is clear that there are people who
believe that unpaid community service does not need to be a mandate part of high
school programmes because it is responsibility of cities or states.
However, there is a persuasive argument
that high school programmes should contribute to community.
Most people think unpaid community services
should be provided by city council. They should not impose roles to schools. In
addition, it is important to ask students whether want to do it or not because
students could not want to do that. If it becomes compulsory programmes, they
would not focus on their original works.
Nonetheless, I firmly believe that schools
should be a part of social communities because we can see that schools are not
only education centre but also one of community centres. Furthermore, students
can learn importance of living in community and how to be a good member of
society and help other people in the neighbourhood and realise to consist of
society themselves so that many students would be contribute for nation and the
world. Joining into society is the first step. Through these activities,
society can be healthier and have firm base.
Even though there are opinions that roles
of community service should not be imposed to high school, it is imperative that
people should learn how to engaged in society from they are younger.