Some think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires special talent and ability. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a disagreement regarding the issue
of whether or not a great artwork can be made by a gifted one. Some people
agree that a person who is a genius inborn is able to create a masterpiece
whereas others insist that normal people can make quality arts if they make hard efforts hard. In this essay, I will consider both views and suggest my own opinion.
Firstly, some people assert that prominent
artworks can be created by gifted people because they can find their talents in
art at an early age and fast quickly absorb relative skills about it. Most people who have
ingenious gifts are found by their parents or teachers in childhood, so they
can develop their talents and are likely to make a masterpiece at an early age.
Also, they are able to absorb and learn skills faster than common people, so there is it
has a higher possibility to create quality art.
However, others insist that quality arts can be are made by normal people since nowadays various skills can be educated in
school and collaboration is important to create a masterpiece in modern arts.
For instance, there are many schools to raise artists, so people who are
disciplined and trained can make quality arts using their skills. Furthermore,
a lot of modern arts are made with people’s cooperation, so it is more
important to create quality art that relies on collaboration, than a gifted one.
In conclusion, I insist that nowadays
quality arts are can (위에도 그렇고, likely와 can은 의미가 전혀 다릅니다. 그리고 논제에 따르면 후자 쪽으로 맞춰주셔야 하고요.) likely to be made by normal people because trends in modern
art show that prominent artworks are created by common people’s collaboration,
not a genius. Therefore, art schools’ role that raises various artists is
crucial more than ever. (논제에서 제언을 요구한 적은 없습니다. 시키는 것에만 집중해주시면 돼요!)
총평: 중간중간에 살짝 아쉬운 부분이 있긴 했지만 그래도 평소대로 잘 써주셨습니다. nallalee님은 최대한 Task1에 집중해주세요! 여기만 조금 더 끌어올리시면 됩니다.
수고하셨습니다 :)