Your Answer ▼
It is often argued that when products are produced, it should be focused on maintaining decent quality, whereas others suggest that as long as the price is cheap, quality is no longer important. Both preferences will be discussed in this essay along with my own opinion.
On the one hand, while the global warming has worsened these days, making products that can be persistently used could prevent climate change. It means, when companies make electronic products such as microwaves and fridges sturdy, it would not break down easily, therefore, customers do not need to throw them away and buy again in a short period/ which this action can participate greater rubbish and emission to the Earth. Moreover, in terms of lucre, customers could figure out that it is a more effective way to spend money on well-made productions. To illustrate, when the product they have bought is consistently malfunctioning break down, they have to buy it again and again, and it eventually requires more money than buying one proper product buy one proper stuff.
In contrast, in order to seize the greater number of citizens, businesses have more possibility to be more flourish and popular when they suggest cheaper price than other companies. It is because, in consideration of modern consumerism patterns, it could be a faster and effective way to attract more customers in order to make significant profits. In addition, it can engage the gap between rich and poor more substantial. In detail, despite of low price, wealthy citizens tend to buy expensive and fancy goods which could be an evidence of define certain wealth classes.
In my judgement, I believe entrepreneurs should consider to provide high standard of goods since it is not only a positive act to climate change but also a moral action.
288자 , 42분 |