In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? |
답안 As the population grows, more and more people want new homes to live in, but the only (이거 반드시 들어가야 합니다.) space for the building is available in the countryside in many cases. Some assert that protecting the countryside from the development is more important. I agree with this opinion and I will further outline my view below. First of all, the countryside is also a home for numerous creatures. I believe that mankind is not the only creature on the Earth. Human beings are Secondly, building new houses in the countryside is a consequence of narrow-sight thinking of city planners, or of greedy capitalists who want to make fortune by construction. To my mind, if necessary, we can develop enough places in the city, not in the countryside. Since the high technology of construction has advanced, it is possible to build extremely high buildings. Additionally, we can demolish old low-stories houses and rebuild a new one which has many homes to live in. In this way, there is no need to build new habitats in the countryside. In conclusion, preserving the countryside should be a top priority than developing the area because nature is a generous home for all, not only for humans. I strongly believe that the growing population still can live in a city with great achievements in the field of construction. |
제가 아직 주장+근거+구체화 하는 연습을 제대로 안해서 많이 부족한 글이에요. 뼈때리는 첨삭과 예상점수 부탁드립니다! 감사해요.
총평: (7/7/7/7) 7.0
뼈때리는 첨삭을 부탁하셔서 눈에 불을 켜고 찾아봤는데, 사실 고칠 내용이 그렇게 많지는 않았습니다. 각 본론이 조금씩 보완되면 더 좋기야 하겠지만, 그건 8~9점에서의 얘기이고 이 점수를 목표로 하는 학생은 없으니까 굳이 이런 것까지 신경쓰지 않으셔도 됩니다. (그 시간에 스피킹 연습 하시는 게 백 배 낫습니다.)
이번 글은 아무리 못해도 7.0 시작이니까 너무 걱정은 마시고, 대신 이정도의 글을 시험장에서도 40분 내에 쓸 수 있도록 실전 적응 연습은 꼭 해주세요!
수고하셨습니다 :)