Your Answer ▼
Recently, the issue of a gap year has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that taking a gap year benefits teenagers a great deal, while others argue otherwise. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached. On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from taking a gap year. An obvious benefit is that pupils who have dwelled in a foreign nation as working holiday visa holders not only have a deeper understanding of different cultures but also become proficient in a second language by travelling overseas. To be more specific, being exposed to an environment where they have to speak other than their mother tongue can lead them to have a tight grasp of a foreign language. In addition, those who decide to work instead of taking trips can (이거 말고, 바로 학교에 등록하는 대신~이라고 적어주셔야 합니다. 그랴야 뒤의 counterpart와 맞게 돼요.) learn invaluable job-related skills at an earlier age, compared to their counterparts, which exerts a positive influence on their future career.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that taking a gap year merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that there is a possibility that adolescents have difficulty concentrating on receiving tertiary education after finishing a gap year since having a gap year deprives students of a chance to study continuously. In other words, they are more likely to forget a huge amount of knowledge related to academic studies that they acquired at secondary school. Another drawback is that pupils have to take responsibility for risks given that a vast sum of money is needed to travel abroad. If it were not for well-planned goals for teenagers, they would waste huge deals of time as well as money (돈이 먼저 오도록 바꿔주시면 됩니다.).
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above. |