Your Answer ▼
Some countries have a long working time, and they believe that this will bring more economic success than those countries which do not have a long working time. However, I firmly believe that workers can achieve their goals during the appropriate time because a long working time does not always guarantee is not always guaranteed optimal outcomes.
To begin with, if there is not a limited time in the workplace, nobody wants to go there because they do not want to work for a long time an average time. Some experts argue that these days, many people work average time, and by doing so, their work efficiency has decreased because of stress. As a result, the probability of quitting increase rapidly in modern society. Therefore, by working along with average, many workers lose their enthusiasm because they feel exhausted, and to succeed economically does not relate to working time. (여기부터는 완전히 이상해지고 있는데, 아마 코코아님께서 실수하셨거나 average를 잘못 파악하신 게 아닌가 싶습니다. average 그 자체는 평균을 의미합니다. 고로 얘를 단독으로 쓰면 평균 시간, 즉 길게 일하지 않는 걸 의미해요. long average라고 해야 초과근무 등의 의미를 담아낼 수 있습니다.)
Moreover, many big companies prefer limited working hours rather than as much as they can because by providing worker’s welfare, their work efficiency usually thinks that the first important thing that they can succeed in modern society is to promote worker’s efficiency. (저 본론1을 다시 쓰시고 검사 받으실 때, 이 문장의 경우 의도하신 바를 댓글 주세요!) In addition to this, they provide a gym and several facilities for workers as well as medical insurance. As a result, workers who working these companies can work harder, and they can achieve economic success.
To sum up, I personally believe that a long average working time brings a lot of disadvantages. If companies want to achieve their goals or success, they should promote worker’s work efficiency by providing welfare programs for them.
|