Your Answer ▼
I disagree with this statement because I believe it is dependent dependant on the cherishing of people poeple, satisfying with tiny happenings, and the history of human beings.
Firstly, why people feel happiness of life is cherishable to other people. The Aristoteles, in quoque, has said people have to hang out with others in order to not feel isolation in the society people for no isolation in the sosiety. Whereas, if people don't care of other people, they don't would not be satisfied with theirs mindset which good people used to care. If you have pretending to care people, you can help others exept for being rich. (앞으로도 초록 문장들은 전부 댓글 주시면 됩니다!)
Secondly, if you don't have enough money to help others, you can share with your behaviors and afterwards you can be satisfied satisfying from this attitude. In other words, you and others will be gratified from this these actions. For example, when a poor man is suffering suffered from famine, you can give a bread to him without your money.
Thirdly, our ancestors used to help others from time to time. For instance, if our ancestors who live in natural competition could not can't hunt meats from the nature, they share those with theirs foods around the community shared their food. Afterward emerging being rich, we keep thinking others to whom hardship happen don't be supported without rich being. However, we can help others as the human being. For example, let you educate poor child who don't get enough money.
In conclusion, we can care for others as the love of human beings. If you think considerably a way of help, you can find out various behaviors without having to be rich being. |