Some people say that it is fair for each group member to be given the same grade after a group project.
Other think that different grades should be allocated based on the level of contribution.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Many education experts argue that it is fair to distribute the scores of the group project fairly to each member. However, my opinion is that each member should be given a different score depending on their contribution.
From a different perspective from mine, it is said that teamwork is important in group assignments, so members of the group student should get the same score. It is said that the overall results should be evaluated, not the contribution of each member. Taking my college days as an example, I did a lot of group projects in college. Most of the tasks were evaluated as results, and I learned how to achieve my goals as a group through these tasks.
In my view, however, students are not prepared for the real world, so they have to pick up different scores. In reality, people who don't (줄임말은 풀어써주시는 게 좋습니다.) do their part have to pay. Also, complaints about many group projects indicate that many people have no equity and fairness when they do group projects. And (문장을 and but so로 시작하는 것은 좋지 못합니다.) someone complained that they did more homework while someone else and someone did less. For another example, on a sports team, the best players get the highest salary and the incompetent players are replaced. As such, I think scores should be given according to the team's or group's contribution.
In conclusion, while being evaluated as a result of a task is the way of evaluation, I firmly believe that it is right to give members a score based on fairness and contribution.
-------------------
소요시간 42분 걸렸습니다.
책에 있는 아웃라인을 보고 저의 생각과 섞어서 써봤습니다.
항상 첨삭 감사합니다.
총평: (7/7/7/7) 7.0
시간도 그렇게 많이 오버되지는 않았고, 내용도 비교적 깔끔했기 때문에 이정도면 충분히 점수를 벌어갈 수 있을 겁니다. 대신 본론 첫 번째 문단은 한 줄 정도 더 채워주시는 게 좋고요. 수고하셨습니다 :)