Your Answer ▼Nowadays, there are a lot of information around the world. To survive from the massive information society, we have to give a responsibility to the journalists. I believe we can trust a half of the information which is made by the journalists because knowledge has its own controversies. any knowledges are controveries. There are 3 reasons in this topic. that is Each three reasons for my belief, which is personal capacity, willness (이런 표현은 따로 존재하지 않습니다. 명사형으로 가실 거면 will 로 쓰시면 돼요.), creating new thinking from the journalists.
Firstly, personal capacity which have the journalists have limits of knowing the information, in other words they don't be enough to explain completely in all of the information. (초록 문장은 문법의 문제로 인해 제가 의미파악을 하지 못한 문장들인데, 의도하신 바에 대해 댓글 주시면 확인하고 수정해드리겠습니다.)
Secondly, the journalists's will can be criticized by various opinions. willness are to be criticised own opinions. An example of that is the comments under the internet's online news. Why the comments have under the internet's news is to watch the critics. The reason why there is a comment section is because it provides a space to observe various critics.
Tirdly, a creating a new thought thinking is based on saying differently, for example if people say the coffee raises rasing efficiency to work, other people disagree with this opinion because of insomnia from the coffee. Likewise, beliving the half of opinions gets people to create creating new thinkings.
In conclusion, there are 3 reasons to trust halfly the journalists. Furthermore, no matter people trust the journalists. They consider to say facts as possible as they can do. |