Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, innumerable meteorologists and environmentalists assert that firms that emit many pollutants should pay a tax to solve pollution issues. I completely disagree with this statement since I believe that there will be more effective ways.
On the one hand, there are two reasons why some individuals argue that corporations ought to pay a tax to relieve pollution. From a people’s point of view, they tend to trust something shown superficially or visually. For instance, if those who are not interested in caring environmental issue see a plant, they are likely to believe that that is the main cause of contamination. In relation to this, in the last decade, various media often have broadcast that pilot plants which giants are managing is the main reason of global warming. For this reason, people are prone to think that companies need to pay a tax.
On the other hand, although all governments already receive a lot of money in tax from many behemoths, countries around the world have not yet solved pollution issues. For this reason, I believe that there are more efficient measures. First of all, we can vote for politicians who propose actively to tackle pollution and enforce a new law that constricts haphazard use of the disposable product. Moreover, governments need to create a campaign that can help to change people’s stereotypes concerning pollution and wrong behavior that could accelerate global warming.
To wrap it all up, although people would claim that companies should pay a tax to deal with contamination issues, I believe that there are much greater measures that can aid to solve pollution.
1. 6.5 점이 목표입니다
2. 267자입니다 10월 10일날 시험입니다. 11월 까지는 만들고 싶습니다.
3. task1 2 60분 타이머재고 풀었습니다. 59분 30초정도 걸린거 같습니다.