Your Answer ▼
Nowadays, it is a common belief that preserving the environment should be used in a more fundamental way since science has caused detrimental effects on nature. However, there is a more persuasive argument that only science and technology are able to solve these matters.
On one hand, there are people arguing that most of the scientific works cause serious aspects to the environment. To exemplify, a majority of scientific studies and technology always require experiments to avoid various side-effects. However, these works usually use animals which have similar organic like humans, so most animals are dying until now by purpose experiments. As a result, even if their studies succeed, numerous biodiversity can not be conserved.
However, others claim that the development of science and technology are able to solve the crisis of the environment . To be specific, nowadays, thanks to avent of science, many industrial companies can use renewable energy such as solar panels, wind power and water turbines instead of fossil fuels. Moreover, these days, many electric automobiles are manufactured, so many people might tend to use them because it could not only save people's costs, but also preserve our environment. Because mostly gas and oil provoke a lot of the high level of contamination.
In conclusion,while it is apparent that the development of technology brings negative effects on the environment because of the indiscriminate experiments, it's undeniable that the improvement of science works brings merits to nature because it creates a lot of things that can replace adverse substances. |