Your Answer ▼
Some people argue that people should drop
by the traveling sites to learn directly about the cultural characteristics.
However, I am not in favor of this opinion because there are enough tools that
we can utilize as much as we can.
The apparent distinction between visiting the
sites and learning from other materials is “experience”, which means that using
indirect method takes a backseat to traveling the places. Nevertheless, contemporary
world’s cutting-edge technologies supplement the fault. For instance, by
wearing VR goggles or visualizing the 4D graphics, people can dance and sing with
aboriginals in South Pacific nations. The users can not only feel like they are
really in the places but they can also learn their cultural directly. This shows
that difference between two ways disappears obviously.
On top of that, instead of getting to the
tourist destinations, people can get even more data from other methods such as
books and the Internet. Because they contain enormous extent of information
from experts and ordinary netizens, users can get data which can not get from
going to the places. For example, there are some restricted sites where tourists
cannot entrance because of some safety problems and environmental matters.
However, they can search about the cultures on the Internet or encyclopedias as
fast, accurately and easily as they can
In conclusion, because a number of media
such as books, movies and the Internet can impart a myriad of information about
overseas as much as they possess, it is not mandatory for people to get to the traveling
sites directly. |