Your Answer ▼
Recently, the issue of job types has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that working as a temporary employee allows people to live a better life, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples. On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from landing a temporary occupation. Perhaps the principal advantage is that part-time workers are less likely to experience high levels of stress considering that they can quit the job with greater ease. Another benefit is that the majority of companies do not force those who are engaged in temporary positions to have a tight grasp of work, which makes it possible for them to have a better quality of life (이게 문법상 문제가 있는 건 아니지만, SS님 실력이면 충분히 이것보다 나은 표현을 쓰실 수 있을 것으로 보입니다.). This is because businesses consider these workers to be replaced with full-time workers at any time. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that finding temporary employment is much more beneficial than permanent employment. On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that working as a temporary worker merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that temporary employees often have difficulty building working experiences that are useful for their future career. To exemplify, one recent article released by Seoul times illustrates that approximately 70% of temporary workers failed to gain a permanent job in 2015 and it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was that their previous working experience as a temporary worker exerted a negative influence on job interviewers. (이정도면 그래도 다른 학생들이 '연구에 따르면~' 이라고 쓰는 거에 비해서 훨씬 낫습니다. 물론, SS님 실력을 고려했을 때 이렇게 쓰지 않고 그냥 본론1와 같이 쓰셨다면 더 잘 쓰셨을 거에요.) In addition, there is a possibility that temporary workers can struggle to support their living costs (여기 쉼표를 추천드립니다.) given that the average wage of them is lower than that of permanent workers. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above. |