▶ Your Answer :
In
regards to high-level job positions allocation, I strongly disagree with
companies to biasedly promote a certain gender. It is true that some industries
in developed countries often hire more men for the higher positions, while more
women stay in lower positions. However, setting a regulation dividing job
positions by a certain gender will create negative consequences, such as an
inequality to who are more qualified for higher positions and an unrealistic
employment of special fields.
To begin
with, the most suitable person should be promoted to a high-level position, and
the judgement for this promotion should only consider job performance. If
companies intentionally arrange the gender proportion of the higher job
positions, there are risks, which some employees lose their chances to moving
up by those who are less qualified for the job. As a result, the regulation can
create another type of discrimination against well-qualified individual.
Furthermore,
forcing all the companies in diverse industries to allocate jobs equally may be
unrealistic to some industries. Every workforce have its own job requirements,
which can be different from a range of industries. For example, cosmetic
industries are likely to hire more women because of its industry speciality. To
successfully run business, the companies should consider their consumer characteristics,
and they have rights to flexibly recruit their employees and allocate them to
the most suitable positions.
In
summary, although the sexual equality in workspace is a very important issue in
contemporary society, having the strict rule may cause the different type of
problems, such as the unfair promotion. In addition, companies should set
individual men force strategies, as they have different target consumers. |