There are an opinion that as real skills are more significant than knowledge regarding theories, the organisations may ignore the applicants' qualification on their CVs in the future. Personally, I disagree with this opinion, because the workers who belong to companies are hard to assess all techniques of the participants.
Initially, a number of enterprises have received resumes from people who want to be hired. Then, they choose the people who deserve to attend the interview with the CVs. These consist of personal data as well as qualifications for proving their skills. Some organisations assess how the applicants are adept at the job interview. They may ask in regard to real skills or request to be shown what they are able to do in reality. Besides, some participants after the interview are often hired to demonstrate their technique as a trainee by the companies.
On the other hand, unless the enterprises check the qualification, they have to assess all the applicants' skills. Presumably, they should hold a contest for hiring workers, and the people who applied the competition ought to participate there to be employees. The company may spend a lot of budgets to confirm the applicants' ability in reality and the people who will participate there may be hard to handle their job contest schedules as well. It is such a time-wasting for both.
Therefore, I do think that checking the qualifications on the resume is the easiest way to assess the people whether they are property work. In addition, as there are more courses to be proved the applicants' practical skills, the companies should eliminate the people who are inapt to work from the first step which is checking the CVs.
글자수: 283자
시간: 40분
두 번쨰 본문에서 뭔가 같은 말을 계속 한거같아서 좀 기분이 이상하네여ㅜㅜ
항상 감사합니다^^