Your Answer ▼
In today’s world, students have a time to evaluate their teachers in educational skills, devotion and characteristics etc in the end of the last semester. Some people think that teachers should be criticized by students for a better quality of education while other people disagree with it. They believe teachers are eligible to be unconditionally respected by students. I personally think that the evaluation system is essential for both students and teachers. Many feel that better schools can be made by students and teachers. Therefore they think a way for teachers’ development and it is the evaluation system. In Korea, it is only about 15 years that the evaluation system was implemented. According to a report from a Korea Education Office, scores each teacher gets have gradually increased. This means teachers are concerned with their evaluations and make an effort to develop themselves to receive positive evaluations. This can raise the quality of education and therefore students can study in a better atmosphere. However, there is a problem that the evaluation system is considered rude for teachers by some people. Needless to say, there are teachers who feel insulted with the system. Even there have been cases that teachers who did not get good reputations revenged themselves on students who gave poor scores on them by scolding students with no reasons, giving low scores in exams and so on. However, it can be corrected by thoroughly guaranteeing anonymity and educating teachers the importance of evaluations by students for their improvement. In conclusion, it is crucial for teachers to consistently care about their evaluations and try to prepare for their qualifications as teachers. (한두줄의 결론이라도 적으려는 편인데 정말 안적어도 되겠다 싶으면 안적을수도 있나요? 아니면 필수적으로 결론은 적어주는 게 맞나요?) ----------------------------------------------- 그리고 discuss both views 유형의 문제에서 그냥 서론에 두 관점의 내용이 무엇인지 정도만 언급하고 나머지 본론과 결론은 제 의견에 대한 내용으로 채워도 되는 건가요 아니면 본론 1 본론 2를 두 관점을 비교하는 데에 쓰고 결론에 제 의견을 간단히 적는 게 더 나을까요? |