Your Answer ▼
Juvenile delinquencies have been on the
rise, and it is debatable whether youth criminals should be punished as adult
criminals should be. Despite the fact that they are the same citizens who did
not comply with the law, some people insist that to adopt a lighter
rehabilitation system for the youth is deemed as ideal. For several reasons I
will discuss below, about why I agree with the statement.
To begin with, it is certain that youth criminals
are still immature to make the right decisions. They are more emotional and impulsive
compared to adults, thus tend to be less moral. This proves that they do not
consider how their actions would affect other innocent social members
adversely. In case their parents or teachers pay less attention to them, they
are likely to go astray with their spontaneous actions. In this sense, paying a severe punishment cannot be an essential way of reducing youth crime, but rather possibly making them disobey the rules of society.
Furthermore, there are some teenagers who
commit petty crimes for a living. They may not have been supported financially
by their parents or the government, which means that they need to cover all the
expenses required for their schools, food, and some other household goods
by themselves. This is more likely to happen in some developing countries where
children’s rights are is not secure yet. As for those youth criminals, putting them
into prison does not help them rehabilitate, but just label them as a criminal.
As mentioned above, it is certain that the youth still needs delicate care and a decent guide from adults. Therefore, I
believe that they should be given another chance with a relatively (항상 상대성이 중요합니다. 지금의 경우도 논제에서부터 성인과의 상대적인 비교를 하고 있죠.) mild penalty. |