Your Answer ▼ There are conflicting opinions toward the issue of whether it is a government's accountability to ensure the nation's healthy diet or it is a part which is personal that the citizens can should (할 수 있는보다는 해야 하는이 더 적절하겠죠.) control. The advocates for the former agruement argument believe that the government is ought to care the nation's health by many ways such as implementing a certain initiative. For example, it will benefit everyone if people are rendered to eat less unhealthy food due to the increase in the cost of the food which are deemed to have deleterious effect on human's health. It may seem an undue restraint towards the public, however, from the longterm view, it will be a good for the public since the people's health level would likely surge with the care of the government. On the other hand, for those who raise a counterargument toward the opinion regard the refreshment which an individual partake is totally up to each person. They say that the people have a right to have the food that is matched with their own appetites, thus the government cannot regulate one's food as well as their eating habit. Even if a person get ill due to noxious diet, it cannot be an reason for the government to implement an initiative concerning the food. It is because it was the person's choice to have the certain food. All in all, I strongly contend that the issue of a healthy diet is not an area that the government can intervene deeply with a policy. However, instead of the a policy concerning the refreshment, I opine that there is a need for the government to establish and run the efficient medical systems which allow the citizens to relish the social service and keep checking their health level. 의식의 흐름대로 썼는데 아이디어를 잘못짜겠네요.. 본론 두번째 문단을 무슨내용으로 보완해야할지 모르겠습니당 ㅠㅠ
본론 첫 번째 문단인데 오타가 난 건가요? 현재 본론 두 번째 문단에는 문제가 없습니다~~
|